Title |
Cancer perceptions: implications from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11764-012-0217-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marc A. Kowalkowski, Stacey L. Hart, Xianglin L. Du, Sarah Baraniuk, David M. Latini |
Abstract |
Research has demonstrated associations between sociodemographic characteristics and illness perceptions; however, the impact of cancer exposure through personal or family diagnoses is not well-studied. The purposes of this study were to examine different cancer beliefs and disparities in cancer beliefs across groups of individuals with distinct cancer histories and to identify whether cancer history predicts a set of cancer beliefs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 28% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,663,331
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#657
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,822
of 160,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.