↓ Skip to main content

Disparities in Diagnoses Received Prior to a Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 5,440)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
66 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
38 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
Disparities in Diagnoses Received Prior to a Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0314-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Mandell, Richard F. Ittenbach, Susan E. Levy, Jennifer A. Pinto-Martin

Abstract

This study estimated differences by ethnicity in the diagnoses assigned prior to the diagnosis of autism. In this sample of 406 Medicaid-eligible children, African-Americans were 2.6 times less likely than white children to receive an autism diagnosis on their first specialty care visit. Among children who did not receive an autism diagnosis on their first visit, ADHD was the most common diagnosis. African-American children were 5.1 times more likely than white children to receive a diagnosis of adjustment disorder than of ADHD, and 2.4 times more likely to receive a diagnosis of conduct disorder than of ADHD. Differences in diagnostic patterns by ethnicity suggest possible variations in parents' descriptions of symptoms, clinician interpretations and expectations, or symptom presentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 336 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Researcher 29 9%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 57 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 128 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 16%
Social Sciences 35 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 69 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,735
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#5
of 5,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56
of 170,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.