↓ Skip to main content

Dark chocolate: consumption for pleasure or therapy?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Dark chocolate: consumption for pleasure or therapy?
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11239-008-0273-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Lippi, Massimo Franchini, Martina Montagnana, Emmanuel J. Favaloro, Gian Cesare Guidi, Giovanni Targher

Abstract

Traditional chocolate is derived from the cocoa bean, which is one of the most concentrated sources of flavanols, a subgroup of the natural antioxidant plant compounds called flavonoids. Accumulating evidence from the past 10 years demonstrates that moderate consumption of chocolate, especially dark chocolate, may exert protective effects against the development of cardiovascular disease. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this positive influence, including metabolic, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-thrombotic effects, as well as effects on insulin sensitivity and vascular endothelial function. Should these results be confirmed in randomised, controlled, cross-over, multi-dose trials, then the pleasure associated with chocolate consumption might also be justified from health and psychological perspectives. However, since dark chocolate has substantially higher levels of flavonoids than milk chocolate, and milk proteins may inhibit absorption of flavonoids, it might be preferable to consume dark chocolate than the white (milk) variety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 20%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,804,078
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#55
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,902
of 87,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them