↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10897-016-9958-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lotte Krabbenborg, L E L M Vissers, J Schieving, T Kleefstra, E J Kamsteeg, J A Veltman, M A Willemsen, S Van der Burg

Abstract

The use of whole exome sequencing (WES) for diagnostics of children with rare genetic diseases raises questions about best practices in genetic counselling. While a lot of attention is now given to pre-test counselling procedures for WES, little is known about how parents experience the (positive, negative, or inconclusive) WES results in daily life. To fill this knowledge gap, data were gathered through in-depth interviews with parents of 15 children who underwent WES analysis. WES test results, like results from other genetic tests, evoked relief as well as worries, irrespective of the type of result. Advantages of obtaining a conclusive diagnosis included becoming more accepting towards the situation, being enabled to attune care to the needs of the child, and better coping with feelings of guilt. Disadvantages experienced included a loss of hope for recovery, and a loss by parents of their social network of peers and the effort necessary to re-establish that social network. While parents with conclusive diagnoses were able to re-establish a peer community with the help of social media, parents receiving a possible diagnosis experienced hurdles in seeking peer support, as peers still needed to be identified. These types of psychosocial effects of WES test results for parents are important to take into account for the development of successful genetic counselling strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 30%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 20%
Psychology 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 44 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,084,571
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#69
of 1,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,327
of 305,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.