You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Influence of Semantically Related and Unrelated Text Cues on the Intelligibility of Sentences in Noise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ear and hearing (Print), November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aud.0b013e318228036a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriana A. Zekveld, Mary Rudner, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Joost M. Festen, Johannes H. M. van Beek, Jerker Rönnberg |
| Abstract |
In two experiments with different subject groups, we explored the relationship between semantic context and intelligibility by examining the influence of visually presented, semantically related, and unrelated three-word text cues on perception of spoken sentences in stationary noise across a range of speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs). In addition, in Experiment (Exp) 2, we explored the relationship between individual differences in cognitive factors and the effect of the cues on speech intelligibility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 35% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 29% |
| Linguistics | 12 | 14% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#1,397
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,051
of 153,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.