You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shengxian Tu, Jelmer Westra, Junqing Yang, Clemens von Birgelen, Angela Ferrara, Mariano Pellicano, Holger Nef, Matteo Tebaldi, Yoshinobu Murasato, Alexandra Lansky, Emanuele Barbato, Liefke C. van der Heijden, Johan H.C. Reiber, Niels R. Holm, William Wijns, FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 16% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 39% |
| Engineering | 23 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#2,604
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,845
of 332,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#63
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.