↓ Skip to main content

Mechanics of Inflationary Deformation During Caldera Collapse: Evidence From the 2018 Kīlauea Eruption

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanics of Inflationary Deformation During Caldera Collapse: Evidence From the 2018 Kīlauea Eruption
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2019
DOI 10.1029/2019gl084689
Authors

Paul Segall, Kyle R. Anderson, Ingrid Johanson, Asta Miklius

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 58%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,111,549
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#4,005
of 19,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,701
of 363,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#77
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.