Title |
Practical guidance for the implementation of the CRISPR genome editing tool in filamentous fungi
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fungal Biology and Biotechnology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40694-019-0079-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Min Jin Kwon, Tabea Schütze, Sebastian Spohner, Stefan Haefner, Vera Meyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Austria | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Portugal | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 21% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,856,740
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Biology and Biotechnology
#24
of 163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,155
of 368,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Biology and Biotechnology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.