| Title |
Intervention Characteristics that Facilitate Return to Work After Sickness Absence: A Systematic Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Hoefsmit, Inge Houkes, Frans J. N. Nijhuis |
| Abstract |
In many Western countries, a vast amount of interventions exist that aim to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. These interventions are usually focused on specific target populations such as employees with low back pain, stress-related complaints or adjustment disorders. The aim of the present study is to detect and identify characteristics of RTW interventions that generally facilitate return to work (i.e. in multiple target populations and across interventions). This type of knowledge is highly relevant to policy makers and health practitioners who want to deliver evidence based care that supports the employee's health and participation in labour. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 18% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 23% |
| Unknown | 49 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 19% |
| Psychology | 38 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,643,550
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#43
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,034
of 173,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them