↓ Skip to main content

The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Traumatic Stress, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,873)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
483 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
Title
The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma
Published in
Journal of Traumatic Stress, July 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02103658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard G. Tedeschi, Lawrence G. Calhoun

Abstract

The development of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, an instrument for assessing positive outcomes reported by persons who have experienced traumatic events, is described. This 21-item scale includes factors of New Possibilities, Relating to Others, Personal Strength, Spiritual Change, and Appreciation of Life. Women tend to report more benefits than do men, and persons who have experienced traumatic events report more positive change than do persons who have not experienced extraordinary events. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory is modestly related to optimism and extraversion. The scale appears to have utility in determining how successful individuals, coping with the aftermath of trauma, are in reconstructing or strengthening their perceptions of self, others, and the meaning of events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 449 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 18%
Student > Master 69 15%
Student > Bachelor 57 12%
Researcher 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 9%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 107 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 201 43%
Social Sciences 46 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 1%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 120 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#179,763
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Traumatic Stress
#8
of 1,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 28,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Traumatic Stress
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them