↓ Skip to main content

Is There Evidence that Runners can Benefit from Wearing Compression Clothing?

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 2,889)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
45 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
233 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Is There Evidence that Runners can Benefit from Wearing Compression Clothing?
Published in
Sports Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0546-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Azad Engel, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Billy Sperlich

Abstract

Runners at various levels of performance and specializing in different events (from 800 m to marathons) wear compression socks, sleeves, shorts, and/or tights in attempt to improve their performance and facilitate recovery. Recently, a number of publications reporting contradictory results with regard to the influence of compression garments in this context have appeared. To assess original research on the effects of compression clothing (socks, calf sleeves, shorts, and tights) on running performance and recovery. A computerized research of the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science was performed in September of 2015, and the relevant articles published in peer-reviewed journals were thus identified rated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Studies examining effects on physiological, psychological, and/or biomechanical parameters during or after running were included, and means and measures of variability for the outcome employed to calculate Hedges'g effect size and associated 95 % confidence intervals for comparison of experimental (compression) and control (non-compression) trials. Compression garments exerted no statistically significant mean effects on running performance (times for a (half) marathon, 15-km trail running, 5- and 10-km runs, and 400-m sprint), maximal and submaximal oxygen uptake, blood lactate concentrations, blood gas kinetics, cardiac parameters (including heart rate, cardiac output, cardiac index, and stroke volume), body and perceived temperature, or the performance of strength-related tasks after running. Small positive effect sizes were calculated for the time to exhaustion (in incremental or step tests), running economy (including biomechanical variables), clearance of blood lactate, perceived exertion, maximal voluntary isometric contraction and peak leg muscle power immediately after running, and markers of muscle damage and inflammation. The body core temperature was moderately affected by compression, while the effect size values for post-exercise leg soreness and the delay in onset of muscle fatigue indicated large positive effects. Our present findings suggest that by wearing compression clothing, runners may improve variables related to endurance performance (i.e., time to exhaustion) slightly, due to improvements in running economy, biomechanical variables, perception, and muscle temperature. They should also benefit from reduced muscle pain, damage, and inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 320 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 16%
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 13%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 94 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 100 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Engineering 11 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 104 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 544. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#45,370
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#31
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#852
of 313,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.