↓ Skip to main content

読解と音楽 : ポール・ド・マンの「盲目性のレトリック」と「汚損されたシェリー」について

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetics, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 183)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
読解と音楽 : ポール・ド・マンの「盲目性のレトリック」と「汚損されたシェリー」について
Published in
Aesthetics, December 2009
DOI 10.20631/bigaku.60.2_44
Authors

新田 孝行

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,435,662
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetics
#5
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,770
of 176,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them