↓ Skip to main content

Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-703
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Ogilvie, Simon Griffin, Andy Jones, Roger Mackett, Cornelia Guell, Jenna Panter, Natalia Jones, Simon Cohn, Lin Yang, Cheryl Chapman

Abstract

Modifying transport infrastructure to support active travel (walking and cycling) could help to increase population levels of physical activity. However, there is limited evidence for the effects of interventions in this field, and to the best of our knowledge no study has convincingly demonstrated an increase in physical activity directly attributable to this type of intervention. We have therefore taken the opportunity presented by a 'natural experiment' in Cambridgeshire, UK to establish a quasi-experimental study of the effects of a major transport infrastructural intervention on travel behaviour, physical activity and related wider health impacts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 4%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 20%
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Other 12 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 53 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 18%
Sports and Recreations 13 6%
Engineering 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 46 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,973,865
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,136
of 15,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,417
of 88,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#34
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.