↓ Skip to main content

かぜに対する認識と受診信念に関連する要因の探索~健診受診者を対象にしたアンケート調査より~

Overview of attention for article published in An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 120)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
かぜに対する認識と受診信念に関連する要因の探索~健診受診者を対象にしたアンケート調査より~
Published in
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association, March 2019
DOI 10.14442/generalist.42.2
Authors

阪本 直人, 釋 文雄, 堤 円香, 春田 淳志, 後藤 亮平, 前野 哲博

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,792,423
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
#35
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,678
of 357,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them