You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NSAIDs経皮製剤(湿布)が原因と考えられた胃潰瘍の1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.14442/generalist.42.158 |
| Authors |
木本 正英, 更屋 勉, 新井 諒也, 津島 寿幸, 山西 行造 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 25 | 35% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 46 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 99% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#887,288
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
#2
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,842
of 355,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them