| Title |
Seeing Distinct Groups Where There are None: Spurious Patterns from Between-Group PCA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11692-019-09487-5 |
| Authors |
Andrea Cardini, Paul O’Higgins, F. James Rohlf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 50% |
| Scientists | 17 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,164,276
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#42
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,210
of 372,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them