↓ Skip to main content

Social Constructionism and the Significance of Political Rumors in Contemporary ChinaWeapons of the Weak

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Survey, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Constructionism and the Significance of Political Rumors in Contemporary ChinaWeapons of the Weak
Published in
Asian Survey, October 2019
DOI 10.1525/as.2019.59.5.870
Authors

Wen-Hsuan Tsai, Zheng-Wei Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,624,448
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Asian Survey
#964
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,990
of 350,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Survey
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.