Title |
Do Femoral or Salter Innominate Osteotomies Improve Femoral Head Sphericity in Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease? A Meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2326-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Neil Saran, Renjit Varghese, Kishore Mulpuri |
Abstract |
Recently, the authors of two prospective multicenter observational studies recommended surgery to improve head sphericity in older children, whereas large retrospective observational studies suggest that surgery does not improve head sphericity in older children. Thus, the treatment for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) remains controversial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 24% |
Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 52% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2012.
All research outputs
#23,214,800
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,762
of 7,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,319
of 173,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#80
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.