↓ Skip to main content

Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-07132-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Lu, Alex Addo, Zachary Ewart, Andrew Broda, Stephanie Parlacoski, H. Reza Zahiri, Igor Belyansky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Unspecified 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 42%
Unspecified 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,378,905
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#856
of 6,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,259
of 368,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#19
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.