↓ Skip to main content

Real-world outcomes according to treatment strategies in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: an Italian retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Real-world outcomes according to treatment strategies in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: an Italian retrospective study
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12094-019-02222-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Gobbini, R. Chiari, P. Pizzutillo, P. Bordi, L. Ghilardi, S. Pilotto, G. Osman, F. Cappuzzo, F. Cecere, F. Riccardi, V. Scotti, O. Martelli, G. Borra, E. Maiello, A. Rossi, P. Graziano, V. Gregorc, C. Casartelli, C. Sergi, A. Del Conte, A. Delmonte, C. Bareggi, D. Cortinovis, P. Rizzo, F. Tabbò, G. Rossi, E. Bria, D. Galetta, M. Tiseo, M. Di Maio, S. Novello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,254,261
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#267
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,689
of 357,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.