| Title |
DNA extraction for human microbiome studies: the issue of standardization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-019-1843-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Leigh Greathouse, Rashmi Sinha, Emily Vogtmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 217 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 24 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 90 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,291,823
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#977
of 4,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,952
of 372,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#33
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.