↓ Skip to main content

Somatic problems and self-injurious behaviour 18 years after teenage-onset anorexia nervosa

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Somatic problems and self-injurious behaviour 18 years after teenage-onset anorexia nervosa
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00787-012-0274-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabet Wentz, I. Carina Gillberg, Henrik Anckarsäter, Christopher Gillberg, Maria Råstam

Abstract

The aim of this study was to study long-term outcome of physical health and self-injurious behaviour (SIB) in anorexia nervosa (AN). Fifty-one adolescent-onset AN cases, originally recruited after community screening, and 51 matched controls (COMP) were interviewed regarding somatic problems and SIB and physically examined 18 years after AN onset, at mean age 32 years. Six individuals had an eating disorder (ED). No one had died. The AN group weighed less than the COMP group. The frequency of somatic problems did not differ between groups. Dental enamel lesions and shorter than expected stature occurred only in the AN group. Dysdiadochokinesis was overrepresented in the AN group and age of AN onset was lower among those with the neurological deficit. Severe SIB occurred only in the AN group, predominantly during adolescence. To conclude, somatic problems were common in both groups. Most individuals in the AN group had recovered from their ED, but weight revealed a persistent restricted eating behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Psychology 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,864,354
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,089
of 1,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,220
of 161,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.