| Title |
Multicenter Experience of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Dextrocardia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.07.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jakob Lüker, Santosh K. Padala, Óscar Cano, Thomas Beiert, Brigitte Osswald, Jayanthi N. Koneru, Jan W. Schrickel, Jordana Kron, Hilton Franqui-Rivera, Ariel Gonzalez-Cordero, Bandar S. Al-Ghamdi, Paul R. Roberts, Scott R. Ceresnak, Johannes von Alvensleben, Arian Sultan, Daniel Steven |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,978,377
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#661
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,434
of 363,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#30
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.