↓ Skip to main content

Perceived and Objectively Measured Environmental Correlates of Domain-Specific Physical Activity in Older English Adults.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Aging & Physical Activity, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceived and Objectively Measured Environmental Correlates of Domain-Specific Physical Activity in Older English Adults.
Published in
Journal of Aging & Physical Activity, August 2016
DOI 10.1123/japa.2015-0241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Tzu Wu, Natalia R Jones, Esther M F van Sluijs, Simon J Griffin, Nicholas J Wareham, Andrew P Jones

Abstract

We examine the relative importance of both objective and perceived environmental features for physical activity in older English adults. Self-reported physical activity levels of 8281 older adults were used to compute volumes of outdoor recreational and commuting activity. Perceptions of neighborhood environment supportiveness were drawn from a questionnaire survey and a geographical information system was used to derive objective measures. Negative binominal regression models were fitted to examine associations. Perceptions of neighborhood environment were more associated with outdoor recreational activity (over 10% change per standard deviation) than objective measures (5~8% change). Commuting activity was associated with several objective measures (up to 16% change). We identified different environmental determinants of recreational and commuting activity in older adults. Perceptions of environmental supportiveness for recreational activity appear more important than actual neighborhood characteristics. Understanding how older people perceive neighborhoods might be key to encouraging outdoor recreational activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Sports and Recreations 4 10%
Psychology 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,313,103
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Aging & Physical Activity
#439
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,915
of 352,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Aging & Physical Activity
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.