↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2798-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen M. Berryessa

Abstract

This brief report presents preliminary data on the attitudes of judges on the sentencing of offenders with High Functioning Autism (HFA). Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with twenty-one California Superior Court Judges. Interviews were qualitatively coded and constant comparative analysis was utilized. Findings revealed that judges consider HFA as both a mitigating and aggravating factor in sentencing, and knowledge of an offender's disorder could potentially help judges understand why a criminal action might have been committed. Judges voiced concerns about the criminal justice system being able to effectively help or offer sentencing options for offenders with HFA. Finally, judges reported that they are focused on using their judicial powers and influence to provide treatment and other resources during sentencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 29%
Social Sciences 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,673,136
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,524
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,869
of 313,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#16
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.