| Title |
Sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in people presenting with symptoms: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x706853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen H Bradley, Sarah Abraham, Matthew Ej Callister, Adam Grice, William T Hamilton, Rocio Rodriguez Lopez, Bethany Shinkins, Richard D Neal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 53% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Malta | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#802,155
of 25,155,561 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#349
of 4,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,712
of 364,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,155,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.