| Title |
The accuracy and accessibility of cited evidence: a study examining mental health policy documents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-019-01786-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aika Hui, Luke Sheridan Rains, Anita Todd, Annette Boaz, Sonia Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 45 | 45% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 56% |
| Scientists | 21 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Psychology | 4 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#635,741
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#97
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,239
of 372,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.