| Title |
A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05400-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aisha K. Lofters, Natalie A. Baker, Andree Schuler, Allison Rau, Alison Baxter, Nancy N. Baxter, Edward Kucharski, Fok-Han Leung, Karen Weyman, Tara Kiran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 60% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,068,750
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,195
of 8,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,005
of 372,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#65
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.