| Title |
Assessing agri-environmental schemes for semi-natural grasslands during a 5-year period: can we see positive effects for vascular plants and pollinators?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01861-1 |
| Authors |
Åke Berg, Erik Cronvall, Åsa Eriksson, Anders Glimskär, Matthew Hiron, Jonas Knape, Tomas Pärt, Jörgen Wissman, Michal Żmihorski, Erik Öckinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,153,256
of 24,713,766 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#308
of 2,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,294
of 360,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#12
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,713,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.