| Title |
Cervical radiculopathy: is a prosthesis preferred over fusion surgery? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-019-06175-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline M. W. Goedmakers, Tessa Janssen, Xiaoyu Yang, Mark P. Arts, Ronald H. M. A. Bartels, Carmen L. A. Vleggeert-Lankamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,585,448
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,063
of 4,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,505
of 358,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#27
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,703 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.