↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the MFAS Method for Determining the Wind Velocity Vector from Windcube 200s Lidar Measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of the MFAS Method for Determining the Wind Velocity Vector from Windcube 200s Lidar Measurements
Published in
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, October 2019
DOI 10.1134/s1024856019050166
Authors

A. Stephan, N. Wildmann, I. N. Smalikho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,695,869
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics
#21
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,681
of 355,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them