| Title |
Drinking patterns and the distribution of alcohol-related harms in Ireland: evidence for the prevention paradox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7666-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire O’Dwyer, Deirdre Mongan, Seán R. Millar, Marion Rackard, Brian Galvin, Jean Long, Joe Barry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 20 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 6 | 8% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 1% |
| Vanuatu | 1 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 67% |
| Scientists | 13 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#786,188
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#824
of 17,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,368
of 373,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#21
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.