↓ Skip to main content

Genetic and environmental modulation of neurodevelopmental disorders: Translational insights from labs to beds

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Research Bulletin, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic and environmental modulation of neurodevelopmental disorders: Translational insights from labs to beds
Published in
Brain Research Bulletin, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.04.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith R. Homberg, Evan J. Kyzar, Maria Luisa Scattoni, William H. Norton, Julian Pittman, Siddharth Gaikwad, Michael Nguyen, Manoj K. Poudel, Jeremy F.P. Ullmann, David M. Diamond, Aleksandra A. Kaluyeva, Matthew O. Parker, Richard E. Brown, Cai Song, Raul R. Gainetdinov, Irving I. Gottesman, Allan V. Kalueff

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a heterogeneous group of prevalent neuropsychiatric illnesses with various degrees of social, cognitive, motor, language and affective deficits. NDDs are caused by aberrant brain development due to genetic and environmental perturbations. Common NDDs include autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, communication/speech disorders, motor/tic disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Genetic and epigenetic/environmental factors play a key role in these NDDs with significant societal impact. Given the lack of their efficient therapies, it is important to gain further translational insights into the pathobiology of NDDs. To address these challenges, the International Stress and Behavior Society (ISBS) has established the Strategic Task Force on NDDs. Summarizing the Panel's findings, here we discuss the neurobiological mechanisms of selected common NDDs and a wider NDD+ spectrum of associated neuropsychiatric disorders with developmental trajectories. We also outline the utility of existing preclinical (animal) models for building translational and cross-diagnostic bridges to improve our understanding of various NDDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Master 25 12%
Other 13 6%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 15%
Neuroscience 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 60 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brain Research Bulletin
#1,644
of 2,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,325
of 313,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Research Bulletin
#28
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.