| Title |
Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer C. Thompson, Sara B. Cichowski, Rebecca G. Rogers, Fares Qeadan, Julissa Zambrano, Cynthia Wenzl, Peter C. Jeppson, Gena C. Dunivan, Yuko M. Komesu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 52% |
| Brazil | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 82 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,445,223
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#143
of 2,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,554
of 367,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.