↓ Skip to main content

Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
288 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
462 Mendeley
Title
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirjam Burget, Emanuele Bardone, Margus Pedaste

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 458 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 19%
Researcher 66 14%
Student > Master 55 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Other 72 16%
Unknown 128 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 82 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 45 10%
Engineering 24 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 4%
Computer Science 16 3%
Other 121 26%
Unknown 156 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,816,662
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#135
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,179
of 315,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.