| Title |
Potential use of computer navigation in the treatment of primary benign and malignant tumors in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12178-012-9124-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevan Saidi |
| Abstract |
The treatment of benign and malignant primary bone tumors has progressed over time from relatively simple practice to complex resection and reconstruction techniques. Recently, computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) has been used to assist surgeons to enhance surgical precision in order to achieve these goals. Initially, software developed for CT-based spinal applications was used to perform simple intraoperative point localization. With advances in technique and software design, oncology surgeons have now performed joint sparing complex multiplanar osteotomies using combined CT and MRI image data with precision and accuracy. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the clinical progress to date, the different types of navigation available, methods for error management, and limitations of CAOS in the treatment of pediatric benign and malignant primary bone tumors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Engineering | 6 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,701,130
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#231
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,810
of 165,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.