↓ Skip to main content

Good clinical practice recommendations for the use of PET/CT in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Good clinical practice recommendations for the use of PET/CT in oncology
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00259-019-04553-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-Yves Salaün, Ronan Abgral, Olivier Malard, Solène Querellou-Lefranc, Gilles Quere, Myriam Wartski, Romain Coriat, Elif Hindie, David Taieb, Antoine Tabarin, Antoine Girard, Jean-François Grellier, Isabelle Brenot-Rossi, David Groheux, Caroline Rousseau, Désirée Deandreis, Jean-Louis Alberini, Caroline Bodet-Milin, Emmanuel Itti, Olivier Casasnovas, Françoise Kraeber-Bodere, Philippe Moreau, Arnaud Philip, Corinne Balleyguier, Alain Luciani, Florent Cachin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Other 22 32%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,526,484
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#924
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,849
of 359,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#17
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.