↓ Skip to main content

A random forest algorithm to improve the Lee–Carter mortality forecasting: impact on q-forward

Overview of attention for article published in Soft Computing, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
A random forest algorithm to improve the Lee–Carter mortality forecasting: impact on q-forward
Published in
Soft Computing, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00500-019-04427-z
Authors

Susanna Levantesi, Andrea Nigri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 15%
Mathematics 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,466,849
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Soft Computing
#64
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,534
of 363,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Soft Computing
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.