↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge of heart attack and stroke symptomology: a cross-sectional comparison of rural and non-rural US adults

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Knowledge of heart attack and stroke symptomology: a cross-sectional comparison of rural and non-rural US adults
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T Swanoski, May Nawal Lutfiyya, Maria L Amaro, Michael F Akers, Krista L Huot

Abstract

Understanding the signs and symptoms of heart attacks and strokes are important not only in saving lives, but also in preserving quality of life. Findings from recent research have yielded that the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors are higher in rural populations, suggesting that adults living in rural locales may be at higher risk for heart attack and/or stroke. Knowledge of heart attack and stroke symptomology as well as calling 911 for a suspected heart attack or stroke are essential first steps in seeking care. This study sought to examine the knowledge of heart attack and stroke symptoms among rural adults in comparison to non-rural adults living in the U.S.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 37 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,778,262
of 23,628,742 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,124
of 15,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,770
of 166,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#110
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,628,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.