You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Missense variants in TAF1 and developmental phenotypes: Challenges of determining pathogenicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Mutation, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/humu.23936 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanyin Cheng, Simona Capponi, Emma Wakeling, Elaine Marchi, Quan Li, Mengge Zhao, Chunhua Weng, Stefan G. Piatek, Helena Ahlfors, Robert Kleyner, Alan Rope, Aimé Lumaka, Prosper Lukusa, Koenraad Devriendt, Joris Vermeesch, Jennifer E. Posey, Elizabeth E. Palmer, Lucinda Murray, Eyby Leon, Jullianne Diaz, Lisa Worgan, Amali Mallawaarachchi, Julie Vogt, Sonja A. de Munnik, Lauren Dreyer, Gareth Baynam, Lisa Ewans, Zornitza Stark, Sebastian Lunke, Ana R. Gonçalves, Gabriela Soares, Jorge Oliveira, Emily Fassi, Marcia Willing, Jeff L. Waugh, Laurence Faivre, Jean‐Baptiste Riviere, Sebastien Moutton, Shehla Mohammed, Katelyn Payne, Laurence Walsh, Amber Begtrup, Maria J. Guillen Sacoto, Ganka Douglas, Nora Alexander, Michael F. Buckley, Paul R. Mark, Lesley C. Adès, Sarah A. Sandaradura, James R. Lupski, Tony Roscioli, Pankaj B. Agrawal, Antonie D. Kline, Kai Wang, H. T. Marc Timmers, Gholson J. Lyon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,572,923
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#54
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,075
of 461,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.