↓ Skip to main content

Homelessness among a nationally representative sample of US veterans: prevalence, service utilization, and correlates

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Homelessness among a nationally representative sample of US veterans: prevalence, service utilization, and correlates
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00127-016-1210-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack Tsai, Bruce Link, Robert A. Rosenheck, Robert H. Pietrzak

Abstract

To examine the prevalence of lifetime homelessness among veterans and use of Veterans Affairs (VA) homeless services, as well as their association with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. A nationally representative sample of 1533 US veterans was surveyed July-August 2015. Among all veterans, 8.5 % reported any lifetime homelessness in their adult life, but only 17.2 % of those reported using VA homeless services. Prevalence of homelessness and VA homeless service use did not significantly differ by gender. Being low income, aged 35-44, and having poor mental and physical health were each independently associated with lifetime homelessness. Veterans who were White or lived in rural areas were significantly less likely to have used VA homeless services. Homelessness remains a substantial problem across different generations of veterans. The low reported uptake of VA homeless services suggests there are barriers to care in this population, especially for veterans who live in rural areas. Governmental resources dedicated to veteran homelessness should be supported, and obtaining accurate prevalence estimates are important to tracking progress over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 20%
Social Sciences 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,872,407
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#551
of 2,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,520
of 306,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.