↓ Skip to main content

Striving for Respectful Maternity Care Everywhere

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Striving for Respectful Maternity Care Everywhere
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2004-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rose L. Molina, Suha J. Patel, Jennifer Scott, Julianna Schantz-Dunn, Nawal M. Nour

Abstract

Purpose The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities is a growing area of research and public attention. Description In many countries, disrespect and abuse from maternal health providers discourage women from seeking childbirth with a skilled birth attendant, which can lead to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. This commentary highlights examples from three countries-Kenya, Mexico and the United States-and presents different forms of mistreatment during childbirth, which range from physical abuse to non-consented care to discriminatory practices. Assessment Building on the momentum from the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and the Global and Maternal Neonatal Health Conference, the global community has placed respectful maternity care at the forefront of the maternal and neonatal health agenda. Conclusion Research efforts must focus on context-specific patient satisfaction during childbirth to identify areas for quality improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 21%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 25%
Social Sciences 22 11%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 43 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,762,541
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#270
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,938
of 302,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#8
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.