↓ Skip to main content

Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiology and Therapy, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature
Published in
Cardiology and Therapy, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40119-019-00152-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna V. Subramaniam, Gregory W. Barsness, Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 41%
Engineering 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,442,570
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Cardiology and Therapy
#74
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,370
of 368,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiology and Therapy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.