You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Tumor RNA Sequencing Analysis for Difficult-to-Treat Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Network Open, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13968 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olena M Vaske, Isabel Bjork, Sofie R Salama, Holly Beale, Avanthi Tayi Shah, Lauren Sanders, Jacob Pfeil, Du L Lam, Katrina Learned, Ann Durbin, Ellen T Kephart, Rob Currie, Yulia Newton, Teresa Swatloski, Duncan McColl, John Vivian, Jingchun Zhu, Alex G Lee, Stanley G Leung, Aviv Spillinger, Heng-Yi Liu, Winnie S Liang, Sara A Byron, Michael E Berens, Adam C Resnick, Norman Lacayo, Sheri L Spunt, Arun Rangaswami, Van Huynh, Lilibeth Torno, Ashley Plant, Ivan Kirov, Keri B Zabokrtsky, S Rod Rassekh, Rebecca J Deyell, Janessa Laskin, Marco A Marra, Leonard S Sender, Sabine Mueller, E Alejandro Sweet-Cordero, Theodore C Goldstein, David Haussler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 29 | 66% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 52% |
Scientists | 15 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#452,764
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,632
of 9,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,121
of 375,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#72
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.