| Title |
Using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) to identify mycorrhizal fungi: a methods review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mycorrhiza, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00572-007-0129-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
I. A. Dickie, R. G. FitzJohn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 294 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 25% |
| Researcher | 70 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 194 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2011.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#227
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,540
of 93,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.