↓ Skip to main content

Rapid staining and imaging of subnuclear features to differentiate between malignant and benign breast tissues at a point-of-care setting

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Rapid staining and imaging of subnuclear features to differentiate between malignant and benign breast tissues at a point-of-care setting
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00432-016-2165-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna L. Mueller, Jennifer E. Gallagher, Rhea Chitalia, Marlee Krieger, Alaattin Erkanli, Rebecca M. Willett, Joseph Geradts, Nimmi Ramanujam

Abstract

Histopathology is the clinical standard for tissue diagnosis; however, it requires tissue processing, laboratory personnel and infrastructure, and a highly trained pathologist to diagnose the tissue. Optical microscopy can provide real-time diagnosis, which could be used to inform the management of breast cancer. The goal of this work is to obtain images of tissue morphology through fluorescence microscopy and vital fluorescent stains and to develop a strategy to segment and quantify breast tissue features in order to enable automated tissue diagnosis. We combined acriflavine staining, fluorescence microscopy, and a technique called sparse component analysis to segment nuclei and nucleoli, which are collectively referred to as acriflavine positive features (APFs). A series of variables, which included the density, area fraction, diameter, and spacing of APFs, were quantified from images taken from clinical core needle breast biopsies and used to create a multivariate classification model. The model was developed using a training data set and validated using an independent testing data set. The top performing classification model included the density and area fraction of smaller APFs (those less than 7 µm in diameter, which likely correspond to stained nucleoli).When applied to the independent testing set composed of 25 biopsy panels, the model achieved a sensitivity of 82 %, a specificity of 79 %, and an overall accuracy of 80 %. These results indicate that our quantitative microscopy toolbox is a potentially viable approach for detecting the presence of malignancy in clinical core needle breast biopsies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#2,053
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,667
of 300,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.