You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
犬の乳腺腫瘍に対してレーザー光による温熱療法および犬遺伝子組み換えインターフェロンγ製剤を使用した2症例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2530/jslsm.jslsm-40_0052 |
| Authors |
今本 成樹 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,280,178
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine
#4
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,027
of 474,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them