↓ Skip to main content

Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Considerations of target surface area and the risk of radiosurgical toxicity
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0224047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Strahinja Stojadinovic, Yulong Yan, Andrew Leiker, Chul Ahn, Zabi Wardak, Tu Dan, Lucien Nedzi, Robert Timmerman, Toral Patel, Samuel Barnett, Bruce Mickey, Jeffrey Meyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Physics and Astronomy 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,843,334
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,851
of 197,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,647
of 357,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,238
of 2,564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.