↓ Skip to main content

Search for magnetic monopoles with the MoEDAL prototype trapping detector in 8 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHC

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 24,637)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Search for magnetic monopoles with the MoEDAL prototype trapping detector in 8 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHC
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/jhep08(2016)067
Authors

The MoEDAL collaboration, B. Acharya, J. Alexandre, K. Bendtz, P. Benes, J. Bernabéu, M. Campbell, S. Cecchini, J. Chwastowski, A. Chatterjee, M. de Montigny, D. Derendarz, A. De Roeck, J. R. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, D. Felea, M. Frank, D. Frekers, C. Garcia, G. Giacomelli, D. Hasegan, M. Kalliokoski, A. Katre, D.-W. Kim, M. G. L. King, K. Kinoshita, D.H. Lacarrère, S. C. Lee, C. Leroy, A. Lionti, A. Margiotta, N. Mauri, N. E. Mavromatos, P. Mermod, D. Milstead, V. A. Mitsou, R. Orava, B. Parker, L. Pasqualini, L. Patrizii, G. E. Păvălas, J. L. Pinfold, M. Platkevič, V. Popa, M. Pozzato, S. Pospisil, A. Rajantie, Z. Sahnoun, M. Sakellariadou, S. Sarkar, G. Semenoff, G. Sirri, K. Sliwa, R. Soluk, M. Spurio, Y. N. Srivastava, R. Staszewski, M. Suk, J. Swain, M. Tenti, V. Togo, M. Trzebinski, J. A. Tuszynski, V. Vento, O. Vives, Z. Vykydal, T. Whyntie, A. Widom, G. Willems, J. H. Yoon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 42%
Professor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 50%
Engineering 3 13%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#372,556
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#17
of 24,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,307
of 374,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#1
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.