| Title |
Emotional Abilities in Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD): Impairments in Perspective-Taking and Understanding Mixed Emotions are Associated with High Callous–Unemotional Traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10578-016-0645-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard O’Kearney, Karen Salmon, Maria Liwag, Clare-Ann Fortune, Amy Dawel |
| Abstract |
Most studies of emotion abilities in disruptive children focus on emotion expression recognition. This study compared 74 children aged 4-8 years with ODD to 45 comparison children (33 healthy; 12 with an anxiety disorder) on behaviourally assessed measures of emotion perception, emotion perspective-taking, knowledge of emotions causes and understanding ambivalent emotions and on parent-reported cognitive and affective empathy. Adjusting for child's sex, age and expressive language ODD children showed a paucity in attributing causes to emotions but no other deficits relative to the comparison groups. ODD boys with high levels of callous-unemotional traits (CU) (n = 22) showed deficits relative to low CU ODD boys (n = 25) in emotion perspective-taking and in understanding ambivalent emotions. Low CU ODD boys did not differ from the healthy typically developing boys (n = 12). Impairments in emotion perceptive-taking and understanding mixed emotions in ODD boys are associated with the presence of a high level of CU. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 61 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,698,158
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#549
of 964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,265
of 302,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.